Blog Archives

Walter's Blog

"But how can you live and have no story to tell?" Fyodor Dostoevsky

Reflections on recent events, plus the occasional fact free rant unfiltered by rational argument.

"If you want to read a blog to get a sense of what is going on in Hong Kong these days or a blog that would tell you wh at life was like living in colonial Hong Kong, this blog, WALTER'S BLOG, fits the bill." Hong Kong Blog Review

31/3/2018 0 Comments

Good Friday Cartoon

0 Comments

28/3/2018 0 Comments

A Death in Hong Kong - Book Review

"This story reaches from the gutter to Government House."

John Mac Lennan

To be sure, the MacLennan case pulled back the curtain to reveal an ugly side to Expat Hong Kong. The colonial police inspector's death in 1980 has always drawn considerable attention from the chattering classes — much of this is crass idle speculation or outright distortion. Amateur sleuths, plus armchair detectives allied to conspiracy theories, held forth for decades.

I cannot recall the number of times people have told me, 'it is impossible to shoot yourself five times with a gun'. Then follows a futile attempt to overturn the facts of MacLennan's suicide.

This book, 'A Death in Hong Kong', is probably the last word on the issue unless new evidence comes to light. Nigel Collett, the author, has conducted meticulous research. He has coupled this detail with a clear explanation of the timeline. The examination is forensic and balanced for the most part, as Collett seeks to give an honest account of events. He portrays the key players, sets the scene and speaks to their motivations. Also, he adds details that are significant and some new to me.

Having read TK Yang's 1981 Inquiry report, one came away with a sense of sadness. Collett's book reinforces that sentiment.

Collett lays bare the machinations of a colonial government concerned with appearances instead of the truth. Nobody comes out of this story smelling of roses. Even ardent campaigner Elsie Elliott (later Tu), who did so much to seek the truth, was not above using misleading statements. Having said that, she is the least guilty in this sorry saga. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said of government officials, including Sir Murray MacLehose.

This story reaches 'from the gutter to Government House'. Gradually the Inquiry got closer to the Governor, having 'misfired' and run out of official control. Finally, Governor MacLehose fought to reign in TL Yang and the forthright counsel John Beveridge. The Governor's alleged interference lays bare the falsehood of 'British' justice. No doubt, if the post-1997 administration attempted a similar move, London would be screaming about the 'rule of law'.

This book reminds us that colonial governments exercised power with ruthless leanings. MacLennan was easy fodder, while allegations against others, more senior, went un-investigated. The evidence points to colonial officials, including legal officers, engaged in paedophile activities. These people walked away. And as we've since learnt from such cases in the UK, you can't take official denials at face value.

During my service, I witnessed the infractions of senior folks ignored or explained away. However, the same violation by junior officers resulted in their careers ruined, as the total weight of the discipline system fell on them. The response to indebtedness illustrates the point.

I've spent many an evening debating the MacLennan case, including with people mentioned in the book. Yet, I never knew that he had a wealthy lady friend who furnished him with a car. Furthermore, it's now clear he was bi-sexual. This detail changes the trajectory of the story.

The narrative given to the public was of a rogue police unit pursuing MacLennan of its own volition. That action, it's asserted, drove him to his death. However, Collett shows that the SIU remained under the tight control of senior legal officials, which destroys the myth that MacLennan faced pursuit in a vendetta by a cowboy police outfit. Granted, some of the investigators had anti-gay sentiments, but this is incidental to what evolved.

We know that briefings went up the chain of command, and the instructions came down. MacLennan was a target, not of the police but of the colonial administration. In simple terms, the police served as a helpful tool. Meanwhile, MacLehose sought to absolve his Attorney General, the Commissioner of Police and those suspected of paedophilia. This shameless exercise of power erodes his achievements.

If I have any quibbles with the book, these are minor and don't detract from the thrust of the events portrayed. For example, I don't buy the suggestion that officers adopted corruption because funding was inadequate. The instance of buying typewriters gets cited. The scale and the organisation of corruption suggest greed was the real motive.

There is some conjecture about the Yuen Long incident being a set-up to compromise MacLennan. Bob Wilkinson wouldn't be a party to such an action. I met him on my third day in Hong Kong, and he always impressed me as an upstanding man. Moreover, there is no tangible evidence to suggest Rab Nawaz was culpable. So I'd question whether any set-up existed.

A couple of details surprised me. First, it is perplexing that MacLennan didn't tell Elsie Elliot of his reinstatement when they met on 28th November 1978. Was he confused or seeking to apply more pressure on senior police managers? Second, Fulton, the informant, gives gifts to his handler, CIP Quinn, after a trip overseas. That's an odd detail. I'd infer from that a close relationship, which sits uncomfortably with the allegation that Fulton was under pressure.

The book mentions hapless reporter Ian Whitely seeking to prove it's possible to gain access to MacLennan's flat through a bathroom window. I recall watching that attempt, which failed. Whitely almost fell down the building light-well. He had a history of such stunts, including testing security at Government House. He climbed the perimeter wall only to injure himself.

The handling of MacLennan's remains was deplorable. An incorrect name and a drop-off at Aberdeen instead of the family home show crass insensitivity. The Police Force should be ashamed of that process.

The book is a must-read for anyone seeking to understand a sad episode in Hong Kong's history. Collett affirms that the simple assumption of murder as a cover-up is palpable nonsense. Although, you will still hear that scenario uttered today. The truth is more complicated and intriguing but as disheartening.

0 Comments

25/3/2018 0 Comments

Don't Zap the Zuck - Just Yet!

The Zuck

Facebook was born of male juvenile frustration. If you believe that story, Zuckerberg couldn’t attract the ladies because he wasn’t part of the in-crowd. He fought back by creating an early form of social media for rating the girls and guys. The rest is history.

The 33-year-old has an estimated wealth of US$72 billion. He's gathered that vast sum in under 14 years. By any measure a remarkable achievement.

Today, his baby hosts 2.2 billion users. In the process its transformed human communication bringing untold benefits. For many, Facebook is the only way to run their business, organise protests and training events, or keep in touch with far-flung friends and family. Online activists leveraged the power of Facebook to reach the world, expose corruption and dictators.

Most of us use it for more mundane purposes. For me, it provided great reassurance that I could reach my daughter while at university overseas. She may not have always welcomed the ‘stalking’ as I followed her from party to party. But I must thank the Zuck for that opportunity. Yes, we had to have some rules to respect her privacy. As I reminded her, we only get to see the stuff she posts. If you don’t want your parents to see it, then its probably not something you should post. That’s a pretty good rule for social media.

Remember, social media has a clue in its name. It’s social. This word indicates that you are broadcasting to the world. Even with all the filters operating, restricted access and other provisions, always assume everyone sees everything.

Facebook is free to the user. So what is the product? Well, another thing to remember is that if something is free, then the product is you. The Facebook business model is simple and astute. You give as much personal data as you are prepared to offer. Zuck then sells that to advertisers to help them decide what to sell you. In turn, you get free access to some pretty cool technology.

That’s the deal you sign up for with Facebook. And we’ve all gone along with it for several years. The latest imbroglio arises because some bright spark harnessed Facebook to politics. It was only a matter of time before this happened. The data we provide will give an insight into political views, then help steer how politicians address us.

Let's be clear; this is not a breach of Facebook. You volunteered the information that was harvested and deployed. No one forced you to do that, although ignorance of the consequences was present. The technology worked fine, as usual, human vulnerability is as present as ever. Further, and this is significant, the underlying issues are not unique to Facebook. Other platforms do the same.

The Zuck has proved slow to respond. He’s taken a fair kicking in the press. If he’s to claw back from this, he will need to do some quick work, including giving greater control to the users. These adjustments may involve a change in his business model. That's the price he needs to pay to survive.

A movement is building to exit Facebook. I’m not sure it will have much momentum, given the reliance that many have on the platform. Plus, what’s the alternative?

Where do you go to escape the clutches of Facebook? You’ve spent years creating communities, worked to maintained them. At this point, there is no real alternative to Facebook. It’s breadth of services, its penetration and volume of content make it challenging to drop.

Be honest; it’s a lifeline for many. Community organisers, minority groups and isolated individuals use it as a window to the world. Facebook provides a reach that is not possible elsewhere, and its free at the point of delivery.

No doubt governments are going to get tough on Zuck and others. That’s already in the pipeline. The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) goes live on 25th May. The harmonised regulations bring tighter controls on data sharing as the conditions for consent get strengthened. Companies must use simple, intelligible language and easily accessible content forms. It must be as easy to withdraw approval as it is to give it.

Some of the issues that allowed Cambridge Analytica to exploit Facebook are already contained by changes made. No doubt, in the future, new challenges will arise because the data that Facebook and others hold is gold. We may have to live with that.

I recognise that deleting Facebook will have repercussions for my online and offline life. For the time being, I’m sticking with it. Yet, I’m not using any of the site-based apps and maximising my protection in the privacy settings. I don't play any of those silly games nor attempt the personality tests. Also, I’ll be watching to see steady improvements in controls. In many ways, we're privileged to live at a time when such things as Facebook open our eyes to the world. But don’t be blinded, there is a price to pay.

0 Comments

23/3/2018 0 Comments