The Road to Rochdale

"Everyone must be a slave to the multicultural agenda."

I don't wish to spend my time writing about Pakistani rape gangs in Britain. The topic has been scrutinised from every angle by commentators, pundits, and politicians, the latter attempting to cover their backs. 

Yet, something kept echoing in my mind from Nietzsche. Are we all overlooking something? Is it the case that once the West, Britain in this instance, set off on the path of slave morality, it led to Rochdale? Did slave morality find its ultimate expression in the attacks on disadvantaged white girls by gangs primarily made up of Pakistani men?  

Did slave morality contribute to the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing, which again primarily targeted young white girls attending a pop concert? It prevents a security guard from challenging the bomber at the scene because he feared the prejudice accusation. 

Did it deviate last year and lead to Southport, resulting in the mass stabbing and murder of young white girls at a dance party? 

I keep returning to this theme to ask if the moral compass of the West is so distorted towards being friendly and kind, with a hierarchy of victimhood based on race and colour, which means that these white girls get sacrificed. 

Do not forget that the Royal Navy rescued the Manchester bomber, brought him to Britain, and the state provided him with a college grant. He and his brother used that grant to purchase the materials that constituted the bomb, which killed 23 people and injured over a thousand innocent concert-goers, primarily young girls.

Similarly, the revelations in recent days that the Southport killer, Axel Rudakubana, was referred to anti-terrorist police three times without any action taken is shocking. Don't forget, the authorities portrayed him as a lovely, ordinary lad in an attempt to downplay any implication that he was a terrorist. 

Yet, they were aware that he had downloaded instructions on making ricin, remote-controlled detonators, and acid. Social workers who dealt with him were so concerned that they insisted on police presence at every meeting. Still, no one joined the dots to take action. 

Rudakubana murdered three girls aged six, seven, and nine while injuring ten others. He's now pleaded guilty to terrorist charges despite earlier attempts by those in authority suggesting he was not a terrorist. Those lies fed the riots that rocked Britain last summer. 

And don't forget that the police and the authorities worked relentlessly to smear as racist anyone who dared to talk too loud about the Pakistani rape gangs. Officials ignored the victims, mothers and fathers, instead arresting and intimidating them into silence in the process of absolute annihilation of common decency. 

Why? Well, everyone must be a slave to the multicultural agenda. How else do you explain that the police, the social workers, the legal system and local councils all willfully ignored these crimes? 

Elon Musk's welcome intervention reignited this issue in the public mind, forcing the Labour government's hand. Sure, Musk went overboard with his language about Jess Philips, but he moved the dial, exposing the government's inertia.

As a side issue, Starmer and his team can hardly complain about interference in Britain's internal affairs, considering he sent Labour activists to support presidential candidate Harris against Trump. What goes around comes around.

In Beyond Good and Evil and The Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche elaborates on the concepts of master and slave morality. Master morality encapsulates adventure, creativity, purpose, righteousness, and vigour. In contrast, slave morality embodies the values of the weak, the humble, and those who view themselves as victims. These individuals are reluctant to confront the world as it is, with all its harsh realities and difficult choices. 

As a result, the weak feel frustrated. Life is tough for them, and they cannot obtain what they desire. They envy the strong and secretly despise themselves for being cowardly. Their status takes its toll. Consequently, the weak rationalise that they are good and moral because they are weak, humble, and passive. 

They assert that patience, humility, obedience, and standing by the weak and downtrodden are virtues. And, of course, the opposites of these qualities are evil-aggressiveness, which is malevolent, as well as pride, independence, and the pursuit of physical and material success.

However, it is merely a rationalisation and a clever weakling will never fully convince himself of it. This realisation will cause harm within. Meanwhile, the strong will be laughing at him, which will equally cause harm within. 

He will feel the urge to harm his despised enemy by any means possible. However, he cannot afford direct physical confrontation - he is weak. His only weapons are words. Thus, Nietzsche contended that the weakling becomes remarkably adept at using language.

That cleverness manifests in postmodernism and cultural hierarchies that define white folks as manifestly evil and responsible for all the world's ills. And as I've previously discussed, these ideas spread with the long march through the institutions until they permeate all aspects of life. 

Thus, we must be kind and never too harsh on those we allow to enter our city, including those who may harm us. We must adapt, not them. Nietzsche didn’t advocate for a master morality to counter the weakness. Instead, I suspect he asked us to move beyond both into a more rational,  balanced world that acknowledges and deals with risks.

Returning to cleverness with words, consider watching this exchange between London Mayor Sadiq Khan and Susan Hall as he evades the questions.

As a result, programmes are implemented over time that condition officials to adopt a slave mentality, including an overwhelming desire not to offend minority communities. Given the low status of white girls within this hierarchy, police and social services ignored the evidence provided by the rape victims and their families. 

And every time Labour try to defend itself against criticism, it's worth remembering it was Labour-run councils in the main that ignored and thereby de facto facilitated the rape gangs.

Meanwhile, some in the mainstream media played a role by portraying anyone who dared to point out these crimes as 'motivated by hate and racism.' The Overton Window was closed on mentioning that the culprits largely came from Pakistani communities while deploying the term 'grooming gangs' to soften the narrative.  

And while a few journalists did take a run at the story, they swam against the tide of don't inflame community tensions. After all, it's beneficial to have all these cultures mixing, and the rape of underprivileged poor white girls is a fair price to pay was the sub-text. 

The cover-up worked to downplay this horror show until Musk intervened. The Jay Report, which Starmer clung to for his defence, never meaningfully addressed the rape gangs. Instead, its focus was broader, and one must suspect it was deliberate. Jay focused on child protection in general, and even her recommendations are still pending implementation years later. 

Indeed, she's given evidence to a parliamentary committee that officials reprimanded her, criticising delays in action. It is hard not to conclude that the cover-up goes on. 

Some will baulk at these ideas about the slave mentality, and that is their right. Still, they must answer the above questions and provide a cogent answer. Why was multiculturalism prioritised over the most appalling criminal acts?

So, here we are in 2025 with no police officer, social worker, or official held accountable. Faced with a barrage of criticism, Starmer has announced an 'audit' of the rape gangs - whatever that entails - and five separate local inquiries. Consequently, the councils conducting the cover-up will be allowed to investigate themselves. What could possibly go wrong? 

Everyone knows in the marrow of their bones why the Pakistani rape gangs went unchallenged. But, we need to hear a formal expression of those reasons that a single national inquiry that joins the dots would provide. Until then, allegations of a cover-up will stick. 

(While writing this blog, I used a spell-checker and grammar-checker that indicated it couldn’t assist me with specific paragraphs because some of the words I used were dehumanising and controversial. This response illustrates a point: even the algorithms are now programmed to censor us and keep specific subjects off the page. How frightening is that?