"Why Tango in Paris, when you can Foxtrot in Kowloon?"
  • Walter's Blog.
  • Home
  • Introduction
  • About Walter
    • 1980 Joining Up - Grafton Street >
      • Arrival and First Impressions
      • First Week
      • Training
      • Passing Out
    • Yaumati Cowboy >
      • Getting on the Streets
      • Tempo of the City
      • Jumpers, pill poppers and the indoor BBQ
      • Into a Minefield.
    • Why Tango in Paris, when you can Foxtrot in Kowloon? >
      • Baptism By Fire
      • Kai Tak with Mrs Thatcher.
      • Home; The Boy Returns
  • 1984 - 1986
    • PTU Instructor & Getting Hitched
    • Having a go: SDU
    • Starting a Chernobyl family
    • EOD - Don't touch anything
    • Semen Stains and the rules
  • 1987 to 1992 - Should I Stay or Go?
    • Blue Lights, Sirens & Grenades
    • Drugs, Broken Kids & A Plane Crash
    • 600 Happy Meals Please!
    • Hong Kong's Best Insurance
    • Riding the Iron Horse
  • Crime in Hong Kong
    • Falling Crime Rates - Why?
    • Triads
  • History of Hong Kong Policing
    • History 1841 to 1941
    • History 1945 to 1967
    • Anatomy of the 50 cent Riot - 1966
    • The Fall of a Commissioner.
    • History 1967 to 1980
    • Three Wise Men from the West
    • The Blue Berets.
    • The African Korps and other tribes.
    • Getting About - Transport.
    • A Pub in every station
    • Bullshit Bingo & Meetings
    • Godber - The one who nearly got away.
    • Uncle Ho
  • Top 20 Films
    • 2001 - A Space Odyssey.
    • The Godfather.
    • Blade Runner
    • Kes
    • Star Wars
    • Aliens
    • Ferris Bueller's Day Off
    • The Life of Brian
    • Dr Strangelove.
    • Infernal Affairs
    • Bridge on the River Kwai.
    • This Is Spinal Tap.
    • Chung King Express
    • An Officer and a Gentleman
    • PTU
    • Contact
    • Saving Private Ryan
    • Family Guy Star Wars
    • Zulu
    • Hard Day's Night
  • The Long Read
    • How The Walls Come Down
    • War in Ukraine - the narrative and other stuff.
    • The Hidden Leader
    • The Big Game
  • Walter's Blog.
  • Home
  • Introduction
  • About Walter
    • 1980 Joining Up - Grafton Street >
      • Arrival and First Impressions
      • First Week
      • Training
      • Passing Out
    • Yaumati Cowboy >
      • Getting on the Streets
      • Tempo of the City
      • Jumpers, pill poppers and the indoor BBQ
      • Into a Minefield.
    • Why Tango in Paris, when you can Foxtrot in Kowloon? >
      • Baptism By Fire
      • Kai Tak with Mrs Thatcher.
      • Home; The Boy Returns
  • 1984 - 1986
    • PTU Instructor & Getting Hitched
    • Having a go: SDU
    • Starting a Chernobyl family
    • EOD - Don't touch anything
    • Semen Stains and the rules
  • 1987 to 1992 - Should I Stay or Go?
    • Blue Lights, Sirens & Grenades
    • Drugs, Broken Kids & A Plane Crash
    • 600 Happy Meals Please!
    • Hong Kong's Best Insurance
    • Riding the Iron Horse
  • Crime in Hong Kong
    • Falling Crime Rates - Why?
    • Triads
  • History of Hong Kong Policing
    • History 1841 to 1941
    • History 1945 to 1967
    • Anatomy of the 50 cent Riot - 1966
    • The Fall of a Commissioner.
    • History 1967 to 1980
    • Three Wise Men from the West
    • The Blue Berets.
    • The African Korps and other tribes.
    • Getting About - Transport.
    • A Pub in every station
    • Bullshit Bingo & Meetings
    • Godber - The one who nearly got away.
    • Uncle Ho
  • Top 20 Films
    • 2001 - A Space Odyssey.
    • The Godfather.
    • Blade Runner
    • Kes
    • Star Wars
    • Aliens
    • Ferris Bueller's Day Off
    • The Life of Brian
    • Dr Strangelove.
    • Infernal Affairs
    • Bridge on the River Kwai.
    • This Is Spinal Tap.
    • Chung King Express
    • An Officer and a Gentleman
    • PTU
    • Contact
    • Saving Private Ryan
    • Family Guy Star Wars
    • Zulu
    • Hard Day's Night
  • The Long Read
    • How The Walls Come Down
    • War in Ukraine - the narrative and other stuff.
    • The Hidden Leader
    • The Big Game
Search by typing & pressing enter

YOUR CART

Walter's Blog

"But how can you live and have no story to tell?" Fyodor Dostoevsky
Picture
Reflections on recent events, plus the occasional fact free rant unfiltered by rational argument. 

"If you want to read a blog to get a sense of what is going on in Hong Kong these days or a blog that would tell you wh at life was like living in colonial Hong Kong, this blog, WALTER'S BLOG, fits the bill."  Hong Kong Blog Review

3/10/2022 1 Comment

Putin's Mind Games

Picture
"For the record, we humans fired off over 2000 nuclear bombs, including some 500 at ground level, and we are still here."
None of us understands what is happening in Ukraine. Who can blame the confusion when swamped with a torrent of misinformation and half-truths, all layered atop outright lies? 

Yet, you'd think in this age of spy satellites, mobile phones harnessed to the internet and easy access to instant news — we'd be in the picture. Not so.

Because all sides are seeking to shape the narrative, as states do during wars, you can't trust much of the material fed us. The Russians are pumping out blatant propaganda to shore up their failing invasion. Meanwhile, the so-called free Western media is failing to provide any balance. Early in the conflict, they ran a steady stream of stories suggesting that Putin was dying, mad or close to a breakdown. All proved wrong.

For a lesson in how a spin-operation works, revisit the lead-up to the Iraq war. Taken as a whole, the only logical thing to do is be sceptical of everything. 

To further spice things up, the threat of using nuclear weapons ramps the fear. Putin has made no secret of his position. But would he carry through on the threat? In Washington and other Western capitals, there are two schools of thought.

Optimists assert that Putin won't use nuclear weapons because doing so wouldn't help him. Battlefield atomic weapons work best against large masses of troops or tanks, but the fighting in Ukraine is pretty dispersed. Moreover, taking territory you hit with nuclear weapons isn't an attractive proposition. Plus, he has no way of knowing which direction the fallout might blow, including back into Russia.

Still, Putin might use nuclear weapons to reset the conflict psychologically. He'd aim to shock Kyiv and Washington into de-escalation. Yet that could cause the U.S. and its allies to double down in Ukraine, perhaps directly entering the conflict.

Pessimists aren't so sure Putin is bluffing because using nuclear weapons might not backfire. NATO would have few attractive options in response.

Retaliating with limited nuclear strikes against Russian forces would risk an escalatory spiral. But on the other hand, entering the war with NATO conventional forces might invite more nuclear strikes by Moscow. So there are no decent options.

NATO could try to decapitate the Russian leadership, assuming they know where to hit and when. Yet, I'm sure Putin won't be hanging around in Moscow awaiting a response; he has plenty of hiding places. 

It may help to take a hard look at nuclear weapons cutting through the psychological fear nukes provoke. These weapons do most of their damage by igniting fires over a large area. Further, the blast damage is enormous if detonated at or near the ground. Also, ground or near ground blasts kick up vast amounts of dust. 

This radioactive crud rises high into the atmosphere, spreading its nastiness far and wide. You can create a nuclear winter by blocking the sunlight if you generate enough dust. 

Often overlooked is the electromagnetic pulse generated by nukes and the impact of this phenomenon. More on that later. 

For the record, we humans fired off over 2000 nuclear bombs, including some 500 at ground level, and we are still here. Two of those detonations took place over Japanese cities — places that I've visited. Both are thriving. 

This statement is not meant to make light of what happened at Hiroshima and Nagasaki but rather prove the point that the use of nukes does not herald the end of civilisation. Putin, and indeed Western nuclear planners, know this. 

Sure, if an all-out Cold War-type nuclear exchange took place, the outcome would be apocalyptic. Likewise, a nuclear war between Pakistan and India could bring an awful nuclear winter with widespread starvation and societal dislocation. 

But these scenarios are at the far end of the nuclear options spectrum. All nuclear powers understand this and weigh choices that provide them tactical and strategic advantage. 

For example, a high-altitude airburst by a low-yield nuclear weapon with an enhanced electromagnetic pulse sends a signal of intent. Don't mess with us! 

Detonated over a remote area, such a weapon may not cause direct casualties. However, it could take out the power supply, internet and other electronic systems. And then we ask, would your opponent retaliate in such circumstances? He has to calculate whether any action he takes triggers a further escalation. 

For the aggressor, the psychological impact on your opponent could be enough to force them to negotiate or pause their actions. After all, they've broken the nuclear taboo, and we are in uncharted waters.

With a nuke detonated over a city, the direct effects would be more visible as modern life comes to an instant standstill in the vicinity. Then the ripple effects are felt around the world. The stock markets would tank, as widespread panic takes hold.

The ability of nuclear weapons to dislocate and disrupt societies is telling. Even conventional weapons produce severe impacts. In the 1991 GulfWar, Iraq rained Scud missiles on civilian areas in Israel. A study of all admissions to the emergency rooms in the Israeli area hospitals within eight hours following each missile blast found that only 22% had actual physical injuries related to the explosion. 

Another 22% had used their atropine auto-injectors mistakenly believing they had been exposed to nerve gas. A total of 51% were pure stress casualties, people who could not cope with their panic attacks and anxiety.

To understand the levels of physical destruction and untold horrors, you can play around with this website. For example, an airburst of a Russian SS 25 (800KT) device at 20,000 feet over the Black Sea wouldn't cause any deaths. The same device aimed at Kherson, with a ground level detonation, could kill some 140,000 in the initial blast. Many more would die later.

Although the military planners rarely talk of 'world holocaust' or 'total destruction'; instead, you hear euphemisms such as 'maximum damage expectancy' to describe incinerating innocent families in their homes. 


Then again, an adversary may achieve similar levels of disruption and societal dislocation by attacking the physical aspects of the internet. For instance, cutting internet cables or hitting transmission nodes with conventional explosives would be easy.

Instead, despite all the bluff and rhetoric, his military is somewhat restrained. They've not gone for the "We had to destroy it to save it" mode. Plus, he must be wary of forfeiting the remnants of support he enjoys from China, India and the global south. 

For the most part, the old Cold War approach of strategic stability through 'mutually assured destruction' is no longer valid. Nonetheless, if my thesis is correct, Putin invaded Ukraine as part of his broader campaign to reinstate Russian status; thus, destroying the place goes against his aims. 

With this in mind, once you cut through all the nonsense spewed forth by both sides, you have to conclude that Putin is a rational actor. Granted, he is ruthless and has miscalculated, yet he has not unleashed hell on Ukraine by conventional means. 

The challenge now is to deescalate the situation because a trapped Putin may see leverage in using a nuke given that his army is in retreat (that's a discussion for another day).

Lastly, never forget the bizarre principle of nuclear gamesmanship: the winning move is not to play. 

1 Comment
Chris Emmett
4/10/2022 01:08:26 pm

By threatening to go nuclear, Putin has painted himself into a corner. If he uses nuclear weapons, he and the Russian people will become global pariahs; if he does not, he will be perceived as weak. Putin is a toxic narcissist who cares nothing for the economic plight of his people nor of the world's perception of him as a person. His army is being humiliated and by association, so is he. Joe Biden, has said that any use of nuclear weapons would wreak '... catastrophic consequences for Russia...' I guess Biden had to come out with a strong response but in doing so, he has also painted himself into a corner. It all goes to show that the situation can escalate quickly and is fast becoming very dangerous.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Walter De Havilland was one of the last of the colonial coppers. He served 35 years in the Royal Hong Kong Police and Hong Kong Police Force. He's long retired. 

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017

Home

Introduction

Contact Walter

Copyright © 2015