Being a man is not a crime yet!
"Only 15% of primary school teachers are male"
Yesterday was International Men’s Day. Also, it was International Toilet Day, an unfortunate confluence of events. I wonder if these two celebrations are connected. Indeed, the radical feminists would like to see men flushed down the toilet. They talk of ‘toxic masculinity’ - watch this to hear actual toxicity.
Unfortunately, their agenda is now reaching into UK education policy to deny boys support. Motivated by perverted revenge, the radical feminists are pushing their beliefs too far. This is horrifying.
We shouldn't be surprised by this sort of thing. For years, victimhood feminists have spread their bile and hate-laden agenda. They've relentlessly worked the media. To them, all men are brutes and rapists. While all women are victims, and masculinity should be criminalised as a threat.
Separate train carriages and women-only public spaces are the demands. Rather than recognising the danger they face as a policing issue, there is a tendency to leap to labelling. Every husband, boyfriend, grandfather, boy, and uncle becomes a suspect. Instead of calling upon the vast majority of decent men to protect them, they would exclude all males.
Of course, the hard data blows the feminist case out of the water. Assertions that all men are culprits and not victims are a blatant lie. For starters, estimates suggest that 40% of domestic violence is against men. Much of this under-reported violence lies hidden because men feel a social stigma. The data also shows that women are much less likely to face criminal charges for assaulting their partners— so much for always being the victims.
There is also a significant underreported mental health issue among men. Each day in the UK, 12 men take their own lives. Seven out of ten murder victims are male, and 90% of rough sleepers are men. A staggering 95% of the prison population consists of males. Additionally, men are far less likely to access psychological therapies than women.
In numerous jurisdictions, family courts tend to favour women over men. A study conducted in the USA revealed that a significant majority of attorneys (94% of male and 84% of female) believed that judges displayed bias against fathers. In the overwhelming majority of cases, women are awarded custody of the children, resulting in a process that marginalises fathers.
By driving men out of families—a goal sought by radical feminists— they perpetuate a cycle of distress. Once again, the science is irrefutable: boys who grow up without a male role model tend to be more resentful, angry, unmotivated, and underachieving. These boys, as they become young men, may join gangs, engage in substance abuse, and drift from one crisis to another.
Part of the problem lies in how the entire gender debate has unfolded. The dominant radical feminist belief is that by socialising boys as girls, one can suppress their masculinity. The result is a softer man. This postmodern nonsense lacks foundation, and the outcomes defy expectations. In any case, the research is clear. Gender is not a social construct. Social factors may influence us, but we remain hardwired to a specific gender. Therefore, forcing boys to play with dolls is nonsensical.
Layered atop this is the erroneous notion of a male patriarchy dominating world affairs to the detriment and suppression of women. I wish someone had informed Tina Atkinson of this, as she often physically challenged boys at my secondary school. She didn’t receive the memo, nor did my mum or sister. This insulting idea does nothing but demean women through a baseless theory of no merit.
Likewise, the women at the Bird Eyes factory in Hull frightened us male students who were working part-time. Any lad who dared to enter their realm during the night shift risked the unspeakable.
These radical feminists overlook history, biology, and a significant body of research. This evidence demonstrates that societies require ‘masculine’ men, rather than pseudo-men who have their behaviours dictated by women. When the wolf is at the door, males typically step up. That's when masculinity comes into play—along with removing spiders from the bath.
The desire to see boys succeed is just not there. One British education advocate recently stated, “People do feel cautious about men and boys because it is seen as speaking up on behalf of a privileged class."
How many men are employed in primary schools across the UK? Only 15% of primary school teachers are male, and this percentage is decreasing. As a result, vital male role models are lacking, and children are deprived of the chance to observe positive interactions between men and women.
Numerous studies indicate that teachers often inflate girls' grades. This is attributed to better behaviour from girls in class, leading teachers to reward them. How does this manifest in the real world when employers find that these girls are not as capable as their grades suggest? This practice devalues women and is unjust to men.
It's also notable that radical feminists steer well clear of certain subjects. For instance, I don’t recall them gathering in Rotherham to protest the rape of white girls by British-Pakistani men. Nor did they front up on the TV discussion shows to raise cries in pain for these poor white girls. And yet the feminists got their knickers in a twist because some Hollywood celebrity had her naked photographs hacked. Their silence about Rotherham, Telford and elsewhere exposes deceit. For them, only white men should be held to account.
I doubt many hard-line feminists drop in here to catch up on what a white, middle-aged man is thinking. On the odd chance they do, here’s a suggestion. Something has upset you, and I feel sorry you carry such nonsense in your head. Please give us a break from your doctrine. Go away to educate yourself by studying the peer-reviewed evidence.
And stop talking about men as the enemy of women. As a husband, father and son, I don’t recognise the basis for that statement. It’s insulting to the many women and men who function to raise a family.
November 2018
Unfortunately, their agenda is now reaching into UK education policy to deny boys support. Motivated by perverted revenge, the radical feminists are pushing their beliefs too far. This is horrifying.
We shouldn't be surprised by this sort of thing. For years, victimhood feminists have spread their bile and hate-laden agenda. They've relentlessly worked the media. To them, all men are brutes and rapists. While all women are victims, and masculinity should be criminalised as a threat.
Separate train carriages and women-only public spaces are the demands. Rather than recognising the danger they face as a policing issue, there is a tendency to leap to labelling. Every husband, boyfriend, grandfather, boy, and uncle becomes a suspect. Instead of calling upon the vast majority of decent men to protect them, they would exclude all males.
Of course, the hard data blows the feminist case out of the water. Assertions that all men are culprits and not victims are a blatant lie. For starters, estimates suggest that 40% of domestic violence is against men. Much of this under-reported violence lies hidden because men feel a social stigma. The data also shows that women are much less likely to face criminal charges for assaulting their partners— so much for always being the victims.
There is also a significant underreported mental health issue among men. Each day in the UK, 12 men take their own lives. Seven out of ten murder victims are male, and 90% of rough sleepers are men. A staggering 95% of the prison population consists of males. Additionally, men are far less likely to access psychological therapies than women.
In numerous jurisdictions, family courts tend to favour women over men. A study conducted in the USA revealed that a significant majority of attorneys (94% of male and 84% of female) believed that judges displayed bias against fathers. In the overwhelming majority of cases, women are awarded custody of the children, resulting in a process that marginalises fathers.
By driving men out of families—a goal sought by radical feminists— they perpetuate a cycle of distress. Once again, the science is irrefutable: boys who grow up without a male role model tend to be more resentful, angry, unmotivated, and underachieving. These boys, as they become young men, may join gangs, engage in substance abuse, and drift from one crisis to another.
Part of the problem lies in how the entire gender debate has unfolded. The dominant radical feminist belief is that by socialising boys as girls, one can suppress their masculinity. The result is a softer man. This postmodern nonsense lacks foundation, and the outcomes defy expectations. In any case, the research is clear. Gender is not a social construct. Social factors may influence us, but we remain hardwired to a specific gender. Therefore, forcing boys to play with dolls is nonsensical.
Layered atop this is the erroneous notion of a male patriarchy dominating world affairs to the detriment and suppression of women. I wish someone had informed Tina Atkinson of this, as she often physically challenged boys at my secondary school. She didn’t receive the memo, nor did my mum or sister. This insulting idea does nothing but demean women through a baseless theory of no merit.
Likewise, the women at the Bird Eyes factory in Hull frightened us male students who were working part-time. Any lad who dared to enter their realm during the night shift risked the unspeakable.
These radical feminists overlook history, biology, and a significant body of research. This evidence demonstrates that societies require ‘masculine’ men, rather than pseudo-men who have their behaviours dictated by women. When the wolf is at the door, males typically step up. That's when masculinity comes into play—along with removing spiders from the bath.
The desire to see boys succeed is just not there. One British education advocate recently stated, “People do feel cautious about men and boys because it is seen as speaking up on behalf of a privileged class."
How many men are employed in primary schools across the UK? Only 15% of primary school teachers are male, and this percentage is decreasing. As a result, vital male role models are lacking, and children are deprived of the chance to observe positive interactions between men and women.
Numerous studies indicate that teachers often inflate girls' grades. This is attributed to better behaviour from girls in class, leading teachers to reward them. How does this manifest in the real world when employers find that these girls are not as capable as their grades suggest? This practice devalues women and is unjust to men.
It's also notable that radical feminists steer well clear of certain subjects. For instance, I don’t recall them gathering in Rotherham to protest the rape of white girls by British-Pakistani men. Nor did they front up on the TV discussion shows to raise cries in pain for these poor white girls. And yet the feminists got their knickers in a twist because some Hollywood celebrity had her naked photographs hacked. Their silence about Rotherham, Telford and elsewhere exposes deceit. For them, only white men should be held to account.
I doubt many hard-line feminists drop in here to catch up on what a white, middle-aged man is thinking. On the odd chance they do, here’s a suggestion. Something has upset you, and I feel sorry you carry such nonsense in your head. Please give us a break from your doctrine. Go away to educate yourself by studying the peer-reviewed evidence.
And stop talking about men as the enemy of women. As a husband, father and son, I don’t recognise the basis for that statement. It’s insulting to the many women and men who function to raise a family.
November 2018
Copyright © 2015